Revised master Plan · Land Use Maps · Zoning Regulations (Z.R) · Amendment to Zoning Regulation Dated · Building Bye-Laws Karnataka Municipal Act and Rules, · Karnataka Municipal Act and Rules, · Urban Development Secretariat (Property Tax Rules ). Procedure for Building Plan Approval · Procedure for Site Inspection · Plan Sanction Details · Commencement Certificate Details · Occupancy Certificate Details.

Author: Malakazahn Zukus
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 2 April 2010
Pages: 157
PDF File Size: 16.98 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.20 Mb
ISBN: 791-1-18746-786-9
Downloads: 16670
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mem

Let’s work together to keep the conversation civil. Even otherwise there is nothing to show that the deviations cannot be removed without structurally affecting the building so as to bring it within the requirements of the building plan sanction. A single set of zoning regulations cannot be applied across all states and cities in Karnataka given the varied development needs, growth rates and other uniqueness of each town.

Planning AuthorityMangalore, while dealing with protection of lawz and treated it as protection of special right and special bmbp of citizens, particularly, in matters of complaints regarding unauthorised construction of buildings observed thus: The only method is to have a comprehensive on the ground master planning exercise and not amendments of regulations.

Hence this petition, invoking Article of the Constitution of India, for the following reliefs: Either they don’t act or do not act promptly or do connive at such activities apparently for illegitimate considerations. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. It is the allegation of bbmpp petitioner that 4th respondent without obtaining a sanction of a building plan has put up construction of six floors actually five floors according to learned Counsel for the petitionerconsisting of stilt, ground, first, second and third floors.

At this stage, Sri B. Sub-clause j of Clause IV The owner, it is said, is required to commence the work after the grant of commencement certificate in the form prescribed in Schedule VII. I In the first place, in the absence of a resolution passed by the Corporation, it is unable to accept the plea that zonal regulations prevail over building bye-laws.

A similar process as followed in developing a Master Plan needs to be followed instead of trying to push through something quickly and in stealth. Ex facie, the Assistant Executive Engineer has tendered false evidence, an offence under Sectionsand of the Indian Penal Code, calling forth criminal prosecution. Citizen Action Forum, a Bengaluru-based nongovernmental organisation, has come up with a sample 2105 highlighting the problems of the new Common Zonal Regulations CZR and asking the government to re-consider the new zoning rules that will make master plans irrelevant.


Radhey Shyam Sahuobserved thus: It must be noticed judicial discretion cannot be guided by expediency, but justice 201 be rendered in accordance with law. At paragraph 4, it is stated that the endorsement dated Annexure-M, was issued by Akram Pasha, the lawws Assistant Director of Town Planning while building plan Was sanctioned by the 3rd respondent.

It kaws, therefore, not only the question of stopping the misuser but also making the owners at default accountable for the injuries caused to others.

Although the learned Counsel for the Corporation submits that Annexure-M was issued under a bona fide mistake, since the relevant year in which the plan sanctioned was not correctly informed, I am afraid, is unacceptable.

Cricket Football Tennis Others. Learned Counsel further submits that identical question as to whether bye-laws or zonal regulations would prevail when considered by this Court it is held that it is the zonal regulations that prevail and not bye-laws.

Exercise of discretion as bbmmp by learned Counsel for the 4th respondent will encourage perpetuation of illegalities.

Demolition or alteration of buildings or well work unlawfully commenced, carried on or completed. The Commissioner Sri M.

Those who own the properties that are misused have also implied responsibility towards the hardship, inconvenience, suffering caused to the residents of the locality and injuries to third parties. The people belonging to this class do not realise that the constructions made in violation of the relevant laws, master plan or zonal development plan or sanctioned building plan or the building is used for a purpose other than the one specified in the relevant statute or the master plan, etc.

An additional statement of objections dated of respondents 1 to 3 was filed, inter alia, stating that the report filed on be read as part and parcel of the additional statement of objections. To verify, just follow the link in the message. This is contrary to any sensible guidelines being adopted by developing cities across the world. Oral enquiries of the petitioner with the 3rd respondent was responded to stating that it was for the 2nd respondent to consider the complaint.

The following is the order passed on Unfortunately, despite repeated judgments by this Court and the High Courts, the builders and other affluent people engaged in the construction activities, who have, over the years shown scant respect for regulatory mechanism envisaged in the municipal and other similar laws, as also the master plans, zonal development plans, sanctioned plans, etc.


AIR SCthis Court refused to order regularisation of the illegal construction raised by the appellant and observed:. There is no statutory provision permitting the drafting or formulation of a draft common zoning regulations for the entire state of Karnataka.

This is byye another day in the process of ascertaining compliance of rule of law by the City Corporation. See how NRIs are getting rich with this. Nov 2, Key Phrases are not available yet.

City has new definition of high-rise

AIR SC observed thus: Many such queries answered. The affidavit taken on record is rejected. The draft notifications have been put on the government gazette. According to the petitioner, respondents 1 to 3 colluded with the 4th respondent, and did not prevent construction of the illegal building, but assisted the 4th respondent bmp the erection of the building contrary to the sanction accorded, and when objections were filed did not consider the same.

Kolkata Municipal Corporation And Others. Though it is said that one K. The administration has neither the will nor mechanism to handle this. Indeed, they are accountable to the public when they oaws against the interest of the public. There is no scientific basis for the proposed increased FAR and no evaluation of the subsequent densification. Lakshmi Narayana is personally present and promises the Court to take necessary corrective measure over the duties to be discharged by the Engineers in the matter of constructions of buildings in Bangalore.

Although Zoning Regulations are said to be applicable, nevertheless there is nothing to state that the Bye-laws have no application in the matter of sanction 22015 Building Plans.

‘New zoning rules reduce quality of life in residential areas’ – Citizen Matters, Bengaluru

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3. Judges are not entitled to exercise discretion wearing robes of judicial discretion and pass orders based solely on their personal predilections and peculiar dispositions.

The plan, duly sanctioned, does not provide for such cutting off or rounding of 20155 corners.