This Thesis is written to discuss the truth of Samuel P. Huntington’s thesis about the clash civilization between Islam and West. This Theorized clash civilization. Jauh sebelum Samuel Huntington menuliskan buku TheClash of Civilization. MenurutQuthb, benturanbenturan itu terjadikarena peradaban Barat yang. Download Citation on ResearchGate | BENTURAN PERADABAN DAN CARUT- MARUT POSTMODERNISME Huntington, Samuel P

Author: Molkis Mooguran
Country: Cameroon
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 5 December 2010
Pages: 256
PDF File Size: 12.26 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.73 Mb
ISBN: 445-1-68658-608-2
Downloads: 3596
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulubei

Edward Said issued a response to Huntington’s thesis in his article, ” The Clash of Ignorance “.

Its political and economic elite must support the move. Huntington argued that future perasaban would be fought not between countries, but between cultures, and that Islamic extremism would become the biggest threat to world peace.

This research use of historical method involving four steps: Abstract Abstract This research was to elaborate the big battles between Greece and Persian in the past called by historian as Persian War.

Noam Chomsky has criticized the concept of the clash of civilizations as just being a new justification for the United States “for any atrocities that they wanted to carry out”, which was required after the Cold War as the Soviet Union was no longer a viable threat. On the contrary, Persians civilization will be masterpiece for Eastern world. Huntington also argues that bentura conflicts are “particularly prevalent between Muslims and non-Muslims”, identifying the “bloody borders” between Islamic and non-Islamic civilizations.


The Clash of Civilizations? Huntington argues that the trends of global conflict after the end of the Cold War are increasingly appearing at these civilizational divisions.

Clash of Civilizations – Wikipedia

Huntington refers to countries that are seeking to affiliate with another civilization as “torn countries”. But after the end of the Cold Warworld politics moved into a new phase, huntihgton which non-Western civilizations are no longer the exploited recipients of Western civilization but have become additional important actors joining the West to shape and move world history.

Lechner FJ, Boli J, editors. Huntington argues that a ” Sino-Islamic connection ” is emerging in which China will cooperate more closely with IranPakistan, and other states to augment its international position. This research was to elaborate the juntington battles between Greece and Persian in the past called by historian as Persian War.


Huntington believed that while the age of ideology had ended, the world had only reverted to a normal state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict.

Huntington identifies a major shift of economic, military, and political power from the West to the other civilizations of the world, most significantly to what he identifies as the two “challenger civilizations”, Sinic and Samusl.

Core state conflicts are on a global level between the major states of different civilizations. The Challenges to America’s National Identity Perhaps the ultimate example of non-Western modernization is Russia, the core huntignton of the Orthodox civilization.

Mexico and Russia are also considered to be torn by Huntington. Russia, Bentufan, and India are what Huntington terms ‘swing civilizations’ and may favor either side. According to Huntington, a torn country must meet three requirements to redefine its civilizational identity.

Clash of Civilizations

Turkeywhose political leadership has systematically tried to Westernize the country since the s, is his chief example.

Cultures in world affairs. This page was last edited on 12 Decemberat Second, the public must be willing to accept the redefinition. I, Paris, Robert Laffont,p. This article contains weasel words: In Huntington’s view, intercivilizational conflict manifests itself in two forms: It was proposed in a lecture [1] at the American Enterprise Institutewhich was then developed in a Foreign Affairs article titled “The Clash of Civilizations?

The practice of democracy that has won out in the modern West is largely a result of a consensus that has emerged since the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolutionand particularly in the last century or so.

Huntington suggests that in the future the central axis of world politics tends to be the conflict between Western and non-Western civilizations, in [Stuart Hall]’s phrase, the conflict between “the West and the Rest”. Huntington believes this to be a real consequence of several factors, including the previously mentioned Muslim youth bulge and population growth and Islamic proximity to many civilizations including Sinic, Orthodox, Western, and African.


User Username Password Remember me. Samuel P Huntington made a hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. They have a set of mutual cultural, social, economic and political views and norms which radically differ from those in the West and the Far East. He offers three forms of general actions that non-Western civilization can take in response to Western countries. CS1 French-language sources fr Webarchive template wayback links All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September Articles with weasel words from October All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from November The researcher use Herodotus book Histories to describe the Persian War and comparing with another source such as: Public lecture delivered at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, 19 Octoberpublished in: A longtime critic of the Huntingtonian paradigm, and an outspoken proponent of Arab issues, Edward Said also argues that the clash of civilizations thesis is an example of “the purest invidious racism, a sort of parody of Hitlerian science directed today against Arabs and Muslims” p.

Specifically, he believes that China’s goals are to reassert itself as the regional hegemonand that other countries in the region will ‘bandwagon’ with China due to the history of hierarchical command structures implicit in the Confucian Sinic civilization, as opposed to the individualism and pluralism valued in the West.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. It is to set forth descriptive hypothesis as to what the future may be like. In his hhuntington Terror and LiberalismPaul Berman argues that distinct cultural boundaries do not exist in the present day.

International Politics, 42, pp.