A form of selection bias arising when both the exposure and the disease under study affect selection. In its classical. As such, the healthy-worker effect is an example of confounding rather than selection bias (Hernan et al., ), as explained further below. BERKSONIAN BIAS. Berksonian bias – There may be a spurious association between diseases or between a characteristic and a disease because of the different probabilities of.

Author: Yogor Zur
Country: United Arab Emirates
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 5 October 2012
Pages: 402
PDF File Size: 20.1 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.29 Mb
ISBN: 684-8-77012-365-8
Downloads: 33161
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vizahn

In the numerical example, we have conditioned on being in the top row:. If, however, we look at the full community sample, we would conclude that having respiratory disease has no effect on whether or not one is likely to suffer from locomotor disease.

Just as in such a case-control study, we are unable to directly estimate absolute risks, risk differences, or risk ratios without additional information e. I am grateful to Sander Greenland, Charles Poole, and Lynne Messer for their helpful comments on and discussions of this work.

Independence of these additional factors and both E and D is sufficient but not necessary for lack of bias when conditioning on C.

Figure 2 shows a causal structure in which neither E nor D has any causal effect on C. Assume our clinic does not provide extensive antenatal care beyond antiretroviral therapy, and so attendance at our clinic is lower among women after they become pregnant.

As a quantitative example, suppose a collector has postage stampsof which are pretty and are rare, with 30 being both pretty and rare. Thus if outcome status is the sole biass cause of selection into a study or analysis, or of missing data, the study is analogous to a case-control study under a particular control-sampling scheme; The cohort odds ratio will be unbiased in complete case analysis — assuming no additional variables of interest as bberksonian previous examples.

Sign in to annotate. This article needs attention from an expert in statistics. Conditioning on C leads to simple random sampling within level of the outcome Table 4. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

This is an area where a more structural approach to missing data may be of benefit; in addition, this is a bfrksonian situation in which simulation studies might focus on quantifying the degree and amount of bias introduced by missing data.


First, collider stratification is usually though by no means always explained in a situation in which exposure and disease are marginally independent; it is important to note that stratification on a collider can also introduce bias when exposure and disease are not independent.

Moreover, any analysis of risk factors will wrongly suggest that the risk factors for locomotor disease are also risk factors for respiratory disease.

Berkson’s bias, selection bias, and missing data

Thus, conditioning on C — or restricting to a level of C — is equivalent to taking a simple random sample of the original cohort. Support Center Support Center. This association is represented by a dotted line in Figure 1B.

The above comments apply whether data are missing at random or missing not at random Recall that data are missing at random when the probability of missingness depends on observed data, and are missing not at random when probability of missingness depends at least in biqs on the missing data themselves.

Bias (statistics) – Wikipedia

J Natl Cancer Inst. Images not copyright InfluentialPoints credit their source on web-pages attached via hypertext links from those images. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The results are shown below: Although structure is key to understanding missing data as well as selection bias, whether data are missing at random or not at random remains important because key methods for coping with missingness depend on these assumptions. I discuss implications of the causal structure for bias, and provide brief illustrative examples.

Vital status may sometimes be the dominant cause of loss to follow-up.

Berkson’s bias, selection bias, and missing data

The average nice man that Alex dates is actually more handsome than the average man in the population since even among nice men, the ugliest portion of the population is skipped. Multiple imputation makes a missing-at-random assumption, for example, 16 and equivalent assumptions are made for inverse-probability-of – censoring weights. The causal diagrams do not include confounders, which might occur even in a randomized setting. Please improve the article or discuss the issue.

A Dictionary of Epidemiology Author s: Please discuss this issue on the article’s talk page.


One particular setting of course is antiretroviral therapy treatment cohorts among HIV-positive individuals in sub-Saharan Africa. This page was last edited on 29 Septemberat The birth weight “paradox” uncovered? National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.

Oxford University Press; Figure 3 showed a situation in which missingness is caused by exposure alone, and complete case analysis can be expected to yield unbiased risk differences, risk ratios, and odds ratios. Berkosnian was first recognised in case control studies when both cases and controls are sampled from a hospital rather than from the community.

Berksonizn information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. It can arise when the sample is taken not from the general population, but from a subpopulation. Just as verksonian have argued with regard to selection bias 23 and overadjustment bias, 1718 I here argue that structural considerations are critical for assessing the impact of missing data on estimates of effect. Don’t have an account? Except where otherwise specified, all text and images on this page are copyright InfluentialPoints, all rights reserved.

For example, if we add to Figure 3 a third variable F that causes both C and the D, C is a collider for E and F; then, conditioning on C creates bias of the E-D relationship via F as Figure in the book by Rothman and colleagues This may not be the case, especially if the risk factor is another disease.

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. He puts the stamps which are pretty or rare on display.

However, when data are missing at random and models are fit correctlyboth weighting 15 and multiple imputation 16 approaches can be used to obtain unbiased estimates of the risk difference and risk ratio. However, because data are missing completely at random within exposure category, the risk by exposure status can be calculated without bias: Causal diagram for informative selection bias D, but not E, affects factor C, so conditioning on or restricting to a level of C amounts to simple random sampling within level of D.