Media. Each of the links below opens a PDF file in a new browser window. BioInitiative Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF. Information about the BioInitiative Report for press.
|Published (Last):||15 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||1.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is consistent with established weak field effects on coupled biological oscillators in living tissues. Health agencies, in response, sponsor massive reviews that find no convincing evidence for any health hazard at exposure levels below international exposure limits, even as they point to inconsistencies in the data and bioinitiatife for more research.
Foster is a professor of Bioengineering at biointiiative University of Pennsylvania: Studies that did not report reporg, or which could not confirm studies that earlier had reported effects, are conspicuously missing.
Some sections do not present scientific data in a balanced fashion, do not analyze the quality of the articles cited, or reflect the personal opinions of their authors In particular, it has undertaken to combine the health effects of low- and high-frequency fields that are not technically possible.
The BioInitiative Report
These levels may need to change in the future, as new and better studies are completed. This page was last edited on eeport Aprilat These exposures can cause health risk. EMF efficiently harms cells at a billion times lower levels than conventional heating. Many studies have obvious technical flaws, typically poor dosimetry determining how much exposure the preparation actually received in an experiment or poor temperature control heating is nioinitiative necessary consequence of RF exposure and most biological reactions are sensitive to temperature.
Sage New Chapter — Dr. The enormous popularity of new communication devices that allow email, texting, and access to the Internet from any city street has placed the issue squarely before government agencies like the FDA and the Rwport, and also parents and school administrators.
Picking Cherries in Science: The Bio-Initiative Report
No consistent pattern of an increased risk is seen for meningioma. The DNA in living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at very low levels of exposure, and produces a biochemical stress response. Early in Januarythe BIR appeared in a major update, to extensive media coverage.
EMF bioinitiattive stress proteins indicating an assault on the cell. Ying Li New Chapter: Biomarkers and indicators of disease and their clinical symptoms have striking similarities.
Two individuals Carpenter and Sage wrote the introductory and concluding sections. Preface Preface There is a consistent pattern of increased risk of glioma and acoustic neuroma associated with use of mobile phones and cordless phones. There is a veritable flood of new studies reporting sperm damage in humans and animals, leading to substantial concerns for fertility, reproduction and health of the offspring unrepaired de novo mutations in sperm. Summing up the research, it is more probable than unlikely that non-thermal EMF from cell phones and base stations do have effects upon biology.
These studies report genotoxicity, single-and double-strand DNA damage, chromatin condensation, loss of DNA repair capacity in human stem cells, reduction in free-radical scavengers particularly melatoninabnormal gene transcription, neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, damage to sperm morphology and function, effects on behavior, and effects on brain development in the fetus of human mothers that use cell phones during pregnancy.
From October to August14 scientists and public health experts worked to come up with recommendations for the Bioinitiative Report. Synchronous biological oscillations in cells pacemaker cells can be disrupted by artificial, exogenous environmental signals, resulting in desynchronization of neural activity that regulates critical functions including metabolism in the brain, gut and heart and circadian rhythms governing sleep and hormone cycles Strogatz, The current safety standards are insufficient to protect from non-thermal microwave effects.
BioInitiative Report – Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Safety from Safe Space Protection
For this reason, COMAR recommends that public health officials continue to base their policies on RF safety limits recommended by established and sanctioned international organizations such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protectionwhich is formally related to the World Health Organization.
Australian Centre for Radiofrequency Bioeffects Research. Scientific research on health, either concerning the effectiveness of treatments or possible health risks, is invariably subject to differing interpretations even by well-intentioned reviewers.
The DNA in living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at very low levels of exposure; and produces a biochemical stress response. Health Council of the Netherlands. Inat the Bioelectromagnetics Society’s annual meeting, there was a mini-symposium on electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation to present the science showing biological effects, and the precautionary measures taken by countries around the world.
Sources of fetal and neonatal exposures of concern include cell phone radiation both paternal use of wireless devices worn on the body and maternal use of wireless phones during pregnancy. Where there is combined exposure the damages may add or even synergistically interact, and result in worse damage to genes.
Experts call for changes in cell phone design, warnings, ban on use by children.
Parents must decide whether possible health risks to their children outweigh the convenience of keeping track of them. This massive page report contains 28 sections, incorporating in toto the original version together with new sections. I strongly advise all governments to take the issue of electromagnetic health hazards seriously and to take action while there is still bioinitiativd.
Skip to content Biointiative. Kundi Replacement chapter: Most safety standards are a thousand times or more too high to protect healthy populations, and even less effective in protecting sensitive subpopulations.
It has not been determined to what extent personal characteristics, e. Such problems, however, require exposure to fields at vastly higher levels than anything that would be encountered in ordinary life. It will certainly excite the activists but it is unlikely to influence public policy any more than the first edition did.
The effect has no clear health significance, and it is still an open question whether it is directly caused by exposure to RF fields or some other factor associated with exposure. There is an urgent need to revise EMF exposure standards. Generally, studies must be replicated or be in agreement with similar studies.
Archived from the original on reporr April To improve the reliability of assessments, agencies generally insist on detailed protocols for admitting and evaluating evidence.
Both ELF and RF fields which are subsumed under the more general EMF are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes infrared energy, light, ultraviolet energy, as well as X-rays.