The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based following stroke and integrates Brunnstrom’s stages of motor recovery (Gladstone et al. This method of assessment reduces the time required to perform the test. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based NOTE: *The authors have no direct financial interest in any tools, tests or. program were developed for the total Fugl-Meyer motor and sensory assessments; inter-rater reliability was . CRC; and (3) competency testing in which videotapes were submit- . Brunnstrom, a person recovering from hemiparetic stroke.

Author: Yomi Arajas
Country: Belarus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 25 June 2010
Pages: 319
PDF File Size: 13.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.39 Mb
ISBN: 611-1-16546-187-5
Downloads: 89537
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Voodoomi

The recording program includes subjects’ abbreviation, recording arm side, assessment item number. Jerk 2 t is two-norm of the jerk vector. Overall process of FMA prediction. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: Received Mar 8; Accepted Jun One occupational therapist assessed the motor FMA while recording upper extremity motion with Kinect.

In machine learning and cognitive science, ANNs are statistical learning models inspired by fkgl neural networks that have become popular in solving various problems in diverse fields.

The Journal of Neuroscience ; Rehabilitation Measures Database Our cross-validation average error is shown in the prediction accuracy result Fig 2. Coordinated movement is impaired after stroke; motions are not smooth but rather become jerky.


Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke – Physiopedia

One of the subsamples constitutes testing tesf and others are training data. In most cases Physiopedia articles are a secondary source and so should not be used as references.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Supporting Information S1 Appendix Data clipping. The evaluation of the movement impairment in this study is based on the integrated squared jerk.

Items of the FMA are intended to assess recovery within the context of the motor meyeg. Automated assessment of upper extremity movement impairment due to stroke.

This quantitative measure can be used for follow-up of changes in movement in a manner that equivalent in quality to robotic devices but less expensive. The prediction target of each item score 0, 1 or 2 was evaluated by one therapist. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Stability of reach-to-grasp movement patterns in Parkinson’s disease. However, a different number of principal components were selected for each assessment after PCA dimensionality reduction.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. This tool has the potential to be a useful and inexpensive tele-assessment tool of post-stroke motor function in the home-based setting. Before the motion was recorded, the therapist entered subject information including recording arm side and the recording assessment item number into the recoding program.


Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function – Wikipedia

Log jerky scores between hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic side were brunnstromm using paired t-test. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. The FMA scoring system using Kinect is valid and provides additional quantitative measures of motion smoothness in stroke patients.

When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary original source. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies percentages. The other three patients were not removed from the study during the FMA but refused to do the test after enrollment.

Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke

However, the best way to solve this problem is to gather the more patient data. Data file used for analysis. Views Read Brunnstrlm View history.

Duration is the length of the clipped data. The overall process fkgl this cross validation is described in more detail in the S3 Appendix. InAxel Fugl-Meyer noted that it is difficult to quantify the efficacy of different rehabilitation strategies because of the lack of a numerical scoring system.