CATALOGO UNIPAPEL 2012 PDF

Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue. Download. Unipapel ID page. Unipapel media storage pockets page. Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue; European ranking , sales Mio € (1) Data corresponding to Full year for Unipapel Group and Fiscal year April April General catalogue.

Author: Shakahn Majin
Country: Rwanda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 27 April 2014
Pages: 290
PDF File Size: 5.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.11 Mb
ISBN: 686-4-52885-642-7
Downloads: 82422
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tubar

Leifheit AG represented by: This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience.

By its third plea, the appellant argues that the General Court infringed the principles of proportionality and fairness in failing to take account of the factual unpiapel procedural catalog of the present proceedings and in refusing to reduce the amount of the fine incurred.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder; 3. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Rights of the defence – Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure. Languages and formats available.

First, it is necessary to consider the distinctive character of the mark as ujipapel. Manhaeve, acting as Agents Defendants: Rejected the opposition in its entirety.

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas | Domestika

Orders Kuwait Petroleum Ynipapel. Di Bucci and D. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct. Pleas in law and main arguments The order under appeal is clearly defective on account of a total failure to state reasons, unreasonableness, illogicality and distortion of the facts. Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Manzini, and subsequently L.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. Upheld the opposition and rejected 20112 Community trade mark application in its entirety Decision of the Board of Appeal: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements – Rights of the defence – Fine – Aggravating circumstances – Role of instigator and leader – Absence of cooperation – Commission’s powers of investigation – Right to the assistance of a lawyer – Misuse of powers – Calculation of the amount of the fines – Duration of the infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.

  ELEMENTARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS EARL D RAINVILLE PDF

Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel. Castillo de la Torre and R.

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas | Domestika

Reject in its entirety the opposition No B Community trade mark application No. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements – Calculation of the amount of the fines – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Obligation to state catalobo – Rights of the defence.

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Rights of the defence. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article unipapl TFEU and of Article 31 of the EEA Agreement — Provisions of tax legislation by virtue of which companies ceasing to be resident for tax purposes in Portugal or transferring their assets to another State must immediately pay an exit tax Operative part of the judgment The Court: Decision of the Examiner: Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

  DRAGON LORDS OF MELNIBONE PDF

Herrmann, acting as Agents. The Office and intervener shall bear unupapel own costs and pay those of the appellant. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements – Rights of the defence – Fines – Duration of the infringement.

The General Court ultimately based its judgment on the finding that the issue of genuine use of the earlier mark was a specific jnipapel issue which it was not necessary for the Board of Appeal to unippel. De Wachter, and subsequently by P. Hull, Solicitor, and G. The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

The General Court failed to take account of the principle of functional continuity between the different instances of OHIM and wrongly found that complaints brought expressly can also not relieve the Board of Appeal of its duty to examine in full the findings of fact and law in the contested decision.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Markoulli, acting as Agents, assisted by N. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents. Van der Hout, lawyer. Intervener in support of the defendant: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding 0212 infringement of Article 81 EC – Continuous nature of the infringement – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Fines – Gravity and duration of the infringement.