I am trying to download the Canadian Forces Personnel Appraisal System ( CFPAS) from. I copied the ‘word for word’ info into this thread from the CFPAS Handbook and Policy Directive. You sound like you are somewhat familiar with. 25 Department of National Defence, CFPAS CFPAS Handbook (Ottawa: DND Canada, ), But as they are described in the CFPAS Handbook, they.

Author: Dor Taktilar
Country: Slovenia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 16 December 2018
Pages: 99
PDF File Size: 6.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.93 Mb
ISBN: 638-1-88094-484-7
Downloads: 51416
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faezahn

Leaders must remember that regardless of the difficulty and discomfort during the delivery, the end result will always be worth it. Ccpas constituents do not trust the messenger, then they certainly will not trust the message, which, in this case, is handbolk critical negative feedback. Rather, it is the tacit encouragement of poor performance. Finally, the IA denied the grievor’s request to re-score the PERnoting that the grievor had not provided any convincing evidence in his representations that would support higher scores.

hzndbook A culture has been created within the CAF where constructive feedback often equates to bullying, where compassion for our members hzndbook to protecting their feelings, and where employee happiness supersedes meaningful professional development. Second, the subordinate must readily accept this critical feedback and earnestly endeavour to change behavior such that noted deficiencies are overcome.

CAF leaders must possess the courage to deliver critical negative feedback when warranted, CAF members must foster the resilience to receive it, and CAF evaluation handboo, must ultimately support the healthy exchange of honest feedback. This, according to Major Renault, was the right thing to do. The Committee then found that the grievor’s PER scoring could not be benchmarked to previous PER scoring as that would contravene policy and be contrary to the intent of annual performance appraisals.

The grievor’s supervisor also confirmed that the draft PER was an accurate reflection of his perception of the grievor’s performance and potential.

The Committee also found, based on CFPAS policy, that there was no cdpas to specifically mention letters of appreciation in the PER narrative, noting that the narrative did describe in some detail the grievor’s contribution as indicated by the two letters of appreciation.

This entirely true story names changed yields two key deductions.

For this to work, CAF leaders must relentlessly develop trusting and authentic relationships with their subordinates. Typically, there is not an handboko expectation of perfection. Finally, with regards to grievor’s allegation of the intent of the chain of command to engineer his removal from future Selection Board considerations, the Committee found that the allegations, taken at face value, met the definition of harassment abuse of authority and therefore, the Committee recommended that an investigation be conducted.


A recent survey of private businesses found that more than 70 percent of managers admit they have trouble giving a tough performance review to an underachieving employee. The latter, however, is the foundation of real meaningful growth.

Common menu bar links

Instead, CAF members are supposed to be periodically counseled and candidly presented with a clear list of their strengths and areas of development. Report a problem or mistake on this page. Specific command direction and guidance at the unit level can drastically reduce the impact of the six CFPAS issues mentioned earlier.

This does not mean coddling soldiers or redacting negative feedback at the sight of tears. But are the existing CAF processes optimized for this cultural shift to honest feedback delivery? Fortunately, there are strategies to enable the healthy acceptance of critical negative feedback. Her administrative job knowledge and dedication to her sub-unit were exemplary. Instead, necessary criticism is masked in a smokescreen of positivity, thereby obscuring hard-to-hear truths.

Although all yearly CFPAS guidance emanates from a central source with a view to ensure standardization across the CAF, there are areas of interpretation which manifest themselves as each successive environment, formation, and unit adds their own specific guidance.

More importantly, the Committee found that the imposition of score controls by the branch was not permitted by the policy. As can be seen, both the leader and subordinate have roles to play in normalizing the practice of delivering critical negative feedback. He explained that his supervisor had been directed to lower the scores he had assigned the grievor in a draft version of the PERa copy of which had been provided to the grievor.

Finally, having observed that the grievor provided no new evidence to justify any score increases, the Committee carefully reviewed the grievor’s original contested PER ratings and found that they were consistent with the PER narratives and the CFPAS Word Pictures and did not merit being increased.

Offering critical negative feedback involves one-on-one dialogue, which is extremely uncomfortable for many leaders. Of course, many people—even those who are adequately self-aware—do not enthusiastically appreciate their weaknesses exposed or discussed. Furthermore, many individuals view critical negative feedback as a personal attack and refuse to accept it as a necessary step in self-improvement.


CFPAS Handbook – Translation into French – examples English | Reverso Context

Finally, the handboo of the CFPAS must be acknowledged, and CAF leaders need to ensure that these same limitations do not steer them away from the delivery of critical negative feedback. Fifth, PDRs—the essential quarterly review—are often done poorly or not done at all. Summarizing this point, Scott suggests:.

Indeed, it is this feedback which enables people to become aware of potential barriers to success, thereby affording them the knowledge to ascend and surpass these barriers. The grievor challenged his Personnel Evaluation Report PER indicating that it was not reflective of his performance and potential and therefore did not rank him appropriately among his peers.

Validating these observations, and revealing a general lack of confidence in the CFPAS, the same survey of CAF members revealed that over half the respondents believed that PDRs and PERs are rarely or never used effectively, while only 3 percent believed that they are always used effectively.

To better understand this cultural problem and how to fix it, this study will divide the cultural discussion into two areas: Instead, the responsibility fell to the sub-unit commander, Major Renault.

Based upon several case studies, they assert that tough empathy is one of the single-greatest ways for leaders to show that they care and can be trusted. Constant role changes and promotions demand that CAF members learn new skills and progressively accept increased amounts of responsibility.

You will not receive a reply. I can’t find what I’m looking for.

After all, if something is important to the commander, then it will be important to the subordinate commanders and staff as well. His research suggests that leaders with low EI are unable to control their own emotional response, thereby negating their ability to offer critical negative feedback.

Leaders at all levels must become comfortable in delivering critical negative feedback when and where required. Categorizing areas of development and linking each of them to achievable goals and milestones is far more useful than merely presenting a list of observed deficiencies.

Fortunately, the CFPAS is in the midst of transformation, which may help eliminate some or all of the issues mentioned above.