CONSENSUS AUDITORY-PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF VOICE CAPE-V PDF

Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.

Author: Vojind Vudor
Country: Bolivia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 10 November 2013
Pages: 480
PDF File Size: 4.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.32 Mb
ISBN: 635-9-39864-794-8
Downloads: 45859
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazrale

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Twenty-one postthyroidectomy patients’ voices, representing a wide range of severities, were rated using a custom-automated version of the CAPE-V. The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.

This abstract may be abridged.

Development of a standardized clinical protocol Gail B. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Consennsus to Document Development of a standardized clinical protocol. Intrarater reliability was obtained with Pearson correlation. Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. Consnsus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice, voice assessment, validity, rater reliability.

Eadie Journal of voice: This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.

  HISTIOCYTOSE LANGERHANSIENNE PDF

Despite, there are few Iranian studies about auditory-perceptual assessment of voice. Marc S de BodtFloris L.

A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession. Mahin Sedaie Editor in Chief: Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.

Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. Santosh M, Rajashekhar B. Elsevier About ScienceDirect Remote access Shopping cart Contact and support Terms and conditions Privacy policy We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy Associate Editor: Skip to search form Skip to main content. The Americleft Speech Project: Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer. A new voice rating tool for clinical practice.

Kathy L ChapmanAdriane L. The qualitative content validity was detected by collecting 10 questionnaires from 9 experienced speech and language pathologists and a linguist. Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders. Link to citation list in Scopus. Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian Men and Women aged between 18 and 45 years.

Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing Peter MartinChristpher Palmer Journal of speech, language, and hearing research…. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.

Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Rating action. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology18 2 The qualitative content validity was proved for developed Persian version of the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.

  ERICH VON DANIKEN ARRIVAL OF THE GODS PDF

Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Topics Discussed in This Paper.

Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners’ ratings of severity of dysphonia? J Acoust Soc Am. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.

Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol

From This Paper Figures, tables, and topics from this paper. A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the auditory-percrptual considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included.

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and auditory-peeceptual content and ads. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice.

Keywords Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice Voice Voice assessment. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Published by Elsevier Inc. Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: A Training and Reliability Study.