View Notes – CP3 Chapter V Part 2 Wind Loading from CIVIL ENGI 44 at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology. CODE OF PRACTICE. CEH; TOPIC 1-WIND LOAD CALCULATION 2. Codes of practice & Guideline CP3: Chapter V: Part 2 BRU Technical Guideline no. CP3: Chapter V: Part 2: September: wind pressure on any fascia at the eaves or on any gable between eaves and ridge on duopitch canopies, or to.

Author: Aragrel Arashilrajas
Country: Iceland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 2 May 2015
Pages: 257
PDF File Size: 7.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.22 Mb
ISBN: 152-8-85530-882-5
Downloads: 95240
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dounos

Such structures should be supplied with an erection manual giving: Wind forces on emergency storage structures Introduction Emergencies requiring food relief are sadly a regular occurrence, especially in Africa. This information includes tables of pressure coefficients for tunnel shaped, film plastic-clad structures see Table 2.

Wind loads in BS, CP3 – strukts

If timber walls are used it should be ensured that nails are driven in so they act in shear rather than in tension. Mayo suggests that failures often relate to: Normally, full-scale testing is sufficient. Dry rather than humid air only reaches instability over hot surfaces like roads or deserts where convection causes a shimmering effect. The various structures required to store this food have been evaluated O’Dowd et al. Research findings support the use of quasi-static loadings – even for plasticfilm greenhouses.

Gust speeds are obtained from reliable local data or from: Pressure coefficients Cpe for curved roofs of film plasticcovered greenhouses Single-span. Short extracts of material from this bulletin may be reproduced in any non advertising, non-profit making context provided that the source is acknowledged as follows:. Appendix 3 Cyclic load testing In Tonga after Hurricane Isaac in when damaged structures were inspected it was found that joints between structural members were inadequate, particularly at roof level.

Foundation failure is a common cause of building collapse under wind action Robertson, 1 Figure 1 Laminar and turbulent flow At the edge of the boundary layer next to loadng main stream, the fluid velocity is equal to the main stream speed. This movement cl3 air and the forces it exerts are the subjects discussed next.


Because of failures caused by wind it is considered that this may also be true of emergency stores. Selection of a design wind speed involves consideration of the maximum gust speed for the geographical area, the building, its immediate location and the probability of high winds occurring during the design life.

The pressure coefficient on the underside of any roof overhang should winr taken as that on the adjoining wall surface The coefficient for a low-pitch monopitch roof should be taken as Wind forces on emergency storage structures Valedictory Acknowledgements Summaries Introduction The nature of weather Wind forces Combating wind loads Full-scale testing of film plastic-clad structures Discussion Recomendation Conclusion References Appendices.

A programme of cyclic load tests were conducted to simulate the continual buffeting that a structure receives during a hurricane.

Normally in the troposphere temperature falls with height, the rate of fall being described as the lapse rate. Gust speeds are squared for this purpose, hence the importance of accuracy at the design laoding to achieve robust structures.

Wind loads in BS6399, CP3

Met Office and Eaton Notes: The Building Research Establishment Eaton, and the Meteorological Office have provided 3-second basic gust speeds for a selection of tropical countries Table 1.

Table 2 Pressure coefficients Cpe for curved roofs of film plasticcovered greenhouses Single-span Table 3 Pressure coefficients Cpe for vertical walls of rectangular clad buildings Table 4 Pressure coefficients Cpe on roofs of rectangular clad buildings Note: Gravity-induced convection and the rotation of the earth are responsible for nearly all atmospheric motion; if a volume of air becomes lighter than its surroundings it will rise and start a new loadinb in wind.

Building Research Establishment, Department of the Environment. At the edge of the boundary layer next to the main stream, the fluid velocity is equal to the main stream speed. Measurement of wind loads on full-scale film plastic-clad greenhouses.

CP 3:Chapter V-2:1972

Recomendation It is recommended that manufacturers and donors answer the following questions before supplying emergency stores:. Short extracts of material from this bulletin may be reproduced in any non advertising, non-profit making context provided loadint the source is acknowledged as follows: Every corrugation of roof edges and every other corrugation elsewhere see Figure 2 should be nailed.


Rigid structures likely to be subjected to strong winds should have hip-angled rather than gable ends. Summaries Summary Wind forces on emergency vp3 structures. When calculating total wind forces on a structure internal pressures also contribute.

The nature of weather Wind winc air in motion caused by horizontal pressure difference, itself caused by heating and cooling of the troposphere – the lower 11 km of the atmosphere.

The structure was erected exactly as it would have been in Wlnd and simulated wind forces were applied and distributed so that they produced the same structural effect as design loads. Because emergency storage structures are used loaading food relief in developing countries where no supervision is easily available, it is important that they are accompanied by clear instructions in diagram form to overcome language problems. With laminar flow speed drops sharply, but with turbulence velocity falls only when the fluid is close to the surface.

Conditional instability is when humid air loses moisture by condensation as rain and then behaves like dry air. This is effected by laoding three-second gust speeds and the means to calculate wind loads and also some practical design aids.

Ultimate failure of the structure was caused by fracture of a strap at 1. Although such measures may not be applicable lozding relief stores, efforts can be made to site these structures away from areas which experience strong winds, such as hill tops and valley bottoms, and behind any available cover or wind break.