This collection of essays, based on the Locke Lectures that Nagel delivered at Oxford University in , addresses the conflict between the claims of the group . Derived from Thomas Nagel’s Locke Lectures, Equality and Partiality proposes a nonutopian account of political legitimacy, based on the need to accommodate. PDF | On Jan 1, , Rem B. Edwards and others published Thomas Nagel., Equality and Partiality.
|Published (Last):||24 June 2005|
|PDF File Size:||2.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Without the impersonal standpoint, there would be no morality, only the clash, compromise, and occasional convergence of individual perspectives.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Poetry and Poets: Classical, Early, and Medieval Prose and Writers: Thomas Nagel – – Oup Usa. He is well-known for his critique of reductionist accounts of the mind in his essay “What Is padtiality Like to Nafel a Bat? Oxford University PressMay 11, – Philosophy – pages.
What is always charming about Nagel is his clever writing, his intellectual humor and the methodic presentation of all the theoretical aspects of his argument. Equality and Partiality Thomas Nagel No preview available – ajd I found it very dense and difficult but extremely rich and interesting, and have tried to reread it every one or two years. Jerome Winston Powell rated it really liked it Aug 22, Nagel tries to find a way to support the idea that equality and impartiality can build the society of the future.
Equality and Partiality – Thomas Nagel – Google Books
Haris Cogo rated it really liked it May 29, equalith Arnason and Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski. In a more rational world this book would have the best-seller status that Allen Bloom’s had. The Justification of National Partiality.
Pless – – Journal of Business Ethics 88 S3: Samuel Scheffler – – Oup Usa. University Press Scholarship Online. Account Options Sign in.
Within each individual, Nagel believes, there is a division between two standpoints, the personal and the impersonal. Rick rated it liked it Jun 06, Quinesha rated it it was amazing Oct 18, Fernando De rated it it was amazing Aug 01, Human Rights and Global Health: Nagel points to the problem of balancing equality and partiality as the most important issue with which political theorists are now faced.
Equality and Partiality Thomas Nagel. Books by Thomas Nagel. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Terence Rajivan Edward – – Accepted for Sorites Now, this is a book with a rich political argument. References to this book Public Deliberation: Inhe was awarded a Rolf Schock Prize for his work in philosophy, nad Balzan prize, and the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters from Oxford University.
Equality and Partiality
Common dquality and phrases accept advantages agent-neutral agent-relative alternative argument arrangement attitude basic believe benefit better categorical imperative choice equaligy competitive conception conflict decent demands democratic depends Derek Parfit desire discrimination division economic economic inequality effects egalitarian impartiality egalitarian system ethical everyone’s favor framework freedom G.
Mind and Cosmos Thomas Nagel. Aakash rated it it was amazing Nov 06, Living in the Crosshairs David S. Ebook This title is available as an ebook. Bjorn Delbeecke rated it really liked it Nov 13, Equality and Partiality Thomas Nagel Abstract Thomas Nagel addresses the conflict between the claims of the group and those of the individual.
Print Save Cite Email Share. Preview — Equality and Partiality by Thomas Nagel. This is my favorite work in philosophy and Nagel is my favorite philosopher.
Open Preview See a Problem? Nagel points to the problem of balancing equality and partiality as the most important issue with which political theorists are now faced.
Equality and Partiality Thomas Nagel Limited preview – Nagel attempts to clarify the nature of the conflict — eqkality of the most fundamental problems in moral and political theory — and argues that its reconciliation is the essential task of any legitimate political system. Equaliry guaranteed minimum human ical impartial concern impersonal stand impersonal hagel impersonal values important impose interests John Rawls amd Kantian Lawrence Sager legitimate liberal liberal democracies limited lives ment moral natural nepotism nomic numbers object one’s personal aims personal and impersonal personal motives point of view policies political institutions political legitimacy political theory position possible present priority problem psychological pursuit question Rawls reasonably reject regard require responsible result role Ronald Dworkin sacrifice Scanlon’s sense sexual social minimum society solution sonal standard strongly egalitarian talent Theory of Justice things tion toleration unanimity universalizability unreasonable utilitarian utopian vidual worse.
Without the impersonal standpoint, there would be no morality, only the clash, compromise, and occasional convergence of individual perspectives. Mike James rated it it was amazing Jul 08, Selected pages Title Page. Mirah Curzer rated it it was amazing Mar 22, Arielle Reads rated it really liked it Feb 13, John rated it really liked it Jun 02, Search my Subject Specializations: