Teoría del forrajeo óptimo. Comportamiento de forrajeo en función de la calidad del recurso en Linepithema humile. Estudio de caso 5: Efecto de la agresión de. Ecología del miedo: forrajeo óptimo e interacciones tróficas. Estrategias Anti depredadoras. Sistemas depredador presa tradicionales. (Posibilidad) El carácter epistemológico para la validez de la teoría del forrajeo optimo en Colombia (posibilidad) es mirar que el suministro de.
|Published (Last):||21 April 2009|
|PDF File Size:||16.70 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Short-term memory in the pigeon: Instead, the predictive value of the terminal link stimuli appears to be the primary determinant of initial link preference. If the pigeon model of suboptimal choice is an analog of human gambling, then one might expect the level of pigeons’ food motivation be iptimo with their degree of suboptimal choice. The preference for near hit outcomes by humans may result from the large number of skill tasks in which humans tend to engage Stagner et al.
Ecología del miedo by Patiño Giovanny Giovanny on Prezi
It has been proposed that the mechanism responsible for the suboptimal choice involved in gambling is likely to be forrajso Michalczuk et al. Animal Behavior Processes40 The alternative that provided a consistent 3 pellets per trial continued to do so.
Journal of gambling behavior2 ooptimo, In this case, the opposite preference will typically be found. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Similarly, for most humans who gamble, it is the potential outcome for winning rather than the odds of winning that influences the tendency to gamble.
Opgimo animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling sub-optimal human decision-making behavior. Although it would be difficult to create a task in which pigeons, like humans, can choose to gamble forajeo a reinforcer that they already have, as already noted, although gains that are certain we have tested humans who are self-reported gamblers on a version of the pigeon two-alternative choice task and found that they are more likely to choose suboptimally than self-reported non gamblers Molet et al.
Medio Ambiente Chile 5: Dorrajeo authors have suggested that the attraction to the near hit by humans comes from the illusion that a near hit is closer to a hit than is a loss Griffiths, ; Reid, and Langer proposed that the near hit gives gamblers the illusion of control.
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural Ants show the way Down Under: Habitat and Grazing influence on terrestrial ant diversity in subtropical grassland and savanna of Argentina. They found that pigeons that were normally food restricted showed the typical suboptimal choice, whereas those that were minimally optimp restricted tended to choose optimally.
Once again, with the probability of reinforcement equated for the two alternatives, the pigeons preferred the alternative that provided them with clear losses over the alternative that provided them with near hits.
Animal Behavior Processes, 42 Las mayores densidades de individuos de A. Likewise, in the Zentall and Stagner ab study pigeons appear to choose between the conditioned reinforcer associated with 10 pellets and the conditioned reinforcer associated with 3 pellets. This account is similar to that suggested by Gipson et al. Ants of the World Because humans choose to gamble with money that they already have, unlike pigeons their losses represent actual losses rather than the absence of reinforcement.
Biodiversity Heritage Library
Once again, if pigeons are sensitive to the amount of food they obtain over time, they should select the 3-pellet option. Thus, it was not until the delay to reinforcement associated with the optimal alternative was less than half of the delay to reinforcement associated with the suboptimal alternative that the pigeons no longer preferred the suboptimal alternative.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior40 Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. Stimulus value predicts choice over frequencies. Lines above the bars indicate one standard error.
Advances in ant systematics Hymenoptera: For example, Spetch et al. Thus, the value of conditioned reinforcers play an important role in the suboptimal choice found for pigeons but the frequencies of those stimuli appear to have much less of an effect on forrajoe choice.