Ihtijaj (Argumentation) [Abu Mansur Ahmad Tabarsi, Saiyyed Amir Husayn Sarkishian] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In the introduction. Al–Ihtijaj by Allama Abu Mansur Ahmad Tibrisi Vol Uploaded by Syed Naqvi. Islamic Urdu Book. Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC). Download. Al-Tabarsi and the Distortion of the Qur’an. Al-Tabarsi mentions in his book al- Ihtijaj (vol. 1 pg. ) while discussing the argument of Amir al-Mu’minin `Ali radiya Llahu `anhu.

Author: Nagal Nikosida
Country: Pakistan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 21 May 2015
Pages: 403
PDF File Size: 11.19 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.79 Mb
ISBN: 503-8-17715-272-4
Downloads: 17893
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zura

Nothing more, igtijaj less. The apparent meaning is:. Let him reveal to the people of depth the high status and high rank which was experienced by this elite.

But Our scholars deny that. If that is the case, there are a few results for that.

Al-Tabarsi and the Distortion of the Qur’an

Not even one single human ihtikaj can add any letter, reduce any letter, or change any letter of it. Because no proofs for this available. Al-Bahrani mentions in al-Kashkul vol.

Now could you please tell me if the version of verse that allegedly been revealed like it was narrated by this scholar, was not tampered, changed, altered by dropping name of Ali from it? Secondly, no one has made any excuses for him. As examples, we can mention a few of the works from which he derived the hadith s in the present collection, works which have been independently published in modern times.

Posted October 13, edited. As they omitted other verses. Mirza Nuri did indeed write a book attempting to prove that there are verses missing from the Qur’an. tabzrsi

Noori Tabarsi and his Book – Shia/Sunni Dialogue –

It was compiled in the Safavid period by the famous theologian Muhammad Baqir Majlisi d. And when it was presented to shaykh Noori, he wrote specific book in answers on his doubts meaning doubts of Muarib. Just repeating in case of you missed it. Sign in Already have an account? Al-Tabarsi [1] mentions in his book al-Ihtijaj vol. Apparently some questioner on Sistani’s Center of belief Researches “aqaed. I have added two words, and the meaning of text changed.


As for the book you have referred to in your email, it has an a devious and a intijaj story behind it, created by the opponent of the Shi’a in order to discredit them. What the author fails to mention is that the hadith literature as understood by Shi’ites is not limited to the sayings of the Prophet, but includes those of the Imams as well. This does include all types of human beings.

The book is researched by Muhammad Baqir Musawi Khirsan. The news of those who claimed the Qur’an is self contradicting. Skip ihtijaaj main content. Already have an account? Obviously, such negligence is evil according to reason. Taqiyyah is also needed in breaking this clear knowledge which is firm within the hearts of the one who disagrees and the one who agrees of following and obeying them as well as being pleased with them, the other reason also is that; these people of corruption in the past [16] and present time [17] are more than the people of truth.

All he believed was that some verses are missing like if someone believed the Imams or tabwrsi Prophet could forget at times. You see this normal? It excels in its eloquence, clarity, truth and knowledge. Peace upon the family of Yasin [10].

Whom we supposed to believe in regards to his views? They are generally treated the same way Mirza Nuri’s book is treated. So not sure what fantasy world you are living in to assume that just because someone writes a book showing something that is not a mainstream Shi’i view regarding the Imams, that they would be deemed disbelievers.


O you who have believed, ask Allah to confer blessing upon him and ask Allah to grant him peace. Why can we see shias so frustrated when someone accuse ahlalbayt in deficiency, and we see you honoring and respecting people who accuse Quran in the same? Due to Taqiyyah we cannot generally mention the names of those who altered and changed it the Qur’an nor can we add to its verses more than what they had already placed in the Book while driven by their own desires, for doing so would strengthen the arguments of ihtijah people of Kufr and the deviant sects who oppose our way and would make their position stronger This belief in kufr.

Navigation menu Personal tools Log in. I am sure you can find some far-fetched justifications for the poor man, just like many of your scholars do for ‘Abdullah bin Mas’ud when he decided not to put Surah al-Falaq and al-Naas in his codex because he didn’t deem them to be part of the Qur’an.

Please refer to the reference I provided earlier from al-Dhari’ah. Second of all, why does the Qur’an not being protected whatever this means tarnish its Hujjiyyah the ability to justify my beliefs and actions that were based on the Qur’an, on the Day of Judgment? Israr Ahmedand was quoting from their own works of history, this does not prove that the person is a Nasibi. Correct me if I am wrong, but you argue that Tabarsi simply believed that some parts of Quran are missing.

Posted in Art