|Published (Last):||10 May 2018|
|PDF File Size:||11.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In substance of truth, nothing is gained, because both interpretations see the same basic thing happening—namely, the papacy as a false Christian system coming to prominence in the position vacated by pagan Rome. It has been presented to me that this is not a subject of vital importance. Tremendous effort has been put forth to support the first interpretation. When we come to the New Testament a frequent point is made of telling us that the one who came to save us is the one who is our Creator John 1: Before I do, let me clarify a few things: Secondly, I and many other Adventists have found the opposite to be the case.
The characteristics and deeds of that grand masquerade are listed. This language is keff directly from Genesis: But when we read the statements in their context and take into account other statements she made on the topic, we discover that she did not have the in mind at all. Parallel to the cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8: Contrary to compromising the sanctuary doctrine, this view magnifies its significance.
This is evident by the simple fact that nothing of the sort happened.
Letter to Jeff Pippenger
Forces will be put in motion for the cleansing of pippenfer sanctuary. And it is salvational. This is not exactly what she said. Through study and faith they step into the Most Holy Place, and the heavenly sanctuary that had been eclipsed by the papal system is now rediscovered.
It then projects forward to the latter rain movement that will close up human history, and not once does the book mention pippenegr Scripture does not testify to it, and history reveals no fulfillment of any such curse.
Letter to Jeff Pippenger – No
For the fulfillment of every other Bible prophecy we see historic evidence and correlation. All I ask is that you prayerfully here me out and genuinely try to understand the points I will now make regarding the daily.
Pippenger in December of Suddenly, we are told, in Daniel the word now means paganism. It is understood that much depends on which way Scripture leads us here.
It begins with the message of reform — a reform message. Because of your solid advocacy of the historicist view of Bible prophecy, I believe you could do much good for the cause of God by throwing all the weight of your intellect and influence in that direction and laying aside those view that are indefensible and not held by the general body of your brethren who also advocate the jegf perspective. FaLang translation system by Faboba. Pippenget was the literal week of Creation.
Contact us for more information. This involved allowing the land to have a Sabbath rest every seven years. For a time, those who would not receive the jef were restrained by fear from acting out the sentiments of their hearts; but the passing of the time revealed their true feelings.
Pipppenger fact, I plead with you in this regard. The entire context and flow of Daniel 8 is that the little horn has defamed Christ by setting up a counterfeit system of salvation. It makes far more historic and prophetic sense, and fits so much better with the storyline in Revelation, to understand the sanctuary under attack and the sanctuary to be restored as one and the same:.
Steve Wolhberg Responds to Jeff Pippenger
Simply disregarding my plppenger to the by claiming, as you have in your email, that I lack discernment and am incapable of reasoning from cause to effect does not strengthen your position in the eyes of discerning people who can reason from cause to effect.
All the commandments in both versions are the same except the fourth, the one that pertains to time. My question to you is, do you see a historic fulfillment of the curses delineated in Leviticus 26 resting upon Israel as a ppipenger or upon its land from to ?
With this reading, then we come to Revelation and find congruence with Daniel 8: Again, I believe you are an honest Bible student. First, I agree that Daniel No Answers to the group. The most we can do is recognize that both positions make vital and historically true points, present what we believe are the merits of whichever view we hold, and do not make our position a test.
Her silence is eloquence.