Quantum Reality by Nick Herbert The Trial by Franz Kafka The Psychedelic Experience by Timothy Leary Ulysses by James Joyce Physics As Metaphor by. This clearly explained layman’s introduction to quantum physics is an accessible excursion into metaphysics and the meaning of reality. Herbert. HERBERT: Well, quantum physics started out in the twenties to explain the interaction of light with atoms. It focused on that, but now it’s extended to explain the.

Author: Nataxe Shaktiran
Country: Belgium
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 6 March 2016
Pages: 126
PDF File Size: 9.92 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.4 Mb
ISBN: 162-8-96869-228-9
Downloads: 98393
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Bahn

Good articles Articles with short description Pages to import images to Wikidata. That’s a nice word.

Quantum Reality – Wikipedia

They are not important in getting the results of quantum dynamics, the maths of quantum physics works independently of which interpretation we may choose to believe. So that’s the constraint on this connectedness. These are the ways in which the scientists understand how physics work. The world exists when we don’t look at it in some strange state that is indescribable. One of my claims to fame is that I have produced the shortest proof of Bell’s theorem in existence.

So there might be mood links. As far as physicists, that’s where physics stops. Physicists noted it, said this is very strange, and then they promptly forgot about it for about fifty rdality. I must dive deeper down the rabbit hole!

Quantum Reality

In other words, though our phenomenal world operates at the local level—diminishing with distance, shielded, coterminous, subluminal— realitythe quantum bedrock, is non-local: If all the patterns were instantaneously connected, it would nkck be a strange world, because our ordinary experience is made of patterns of dots, of these little quantum events, and so there wouldn’t be any space for us.

This is the Copenhagen Interpretation of Bohr and its later-derived, Observer-Promoted adjunct, which holds that there is no underlying subphenomenal reality to discover; instead, we have elementary particles at the quantum level in an undefined state of fluctuating and concurrent probabilities; it qyantum our act of observation that forces a wave function collapse and assigns a measured value to these properties.


We’re very distractible, very small-data-rate entities. We used to call this genre “physics for poets. The world is not like this. This determined value had no existence, or meaning, until a measurement created a tangible value out of a sea of possibilities.

Anarchist Meditations on N. This is the infamous Many-Worlds theory, primarily developed by Everett under the auspices of Wheeler. This is one of the clearest explanations of the multiple possible interpretations of quantum physics as a description of reality.

As fast as the typewriter can print, we can generate that. At such a moment—the absurdity of the contention notwithstanding—it certainly does seem that the very act of our being a conscious observer undertakes to determine, in a particular moment, the constituted reality of that very element of the universe; that said light beam’s existence comprised a murky, ghostly ephemerality of possible states until our measuring gaze forced upon it the necessity of making a determination, of collapsing the wave function to the degree that it particulated in space-time with the very attributes we discover when we brought it to bear in such an enigmatic fashion.

Our human minds, delimited to sensory perceptions in our own space-time, cannot perceive this exponential proliferation of fully-formed universes, blossoming under the imposition of every available attribute value allowable to each and every particle; but there they are, expanding rapid-fire like the zits on a soda-chugging teenager under the cascading avalanche of observations that are brought to bear.

I’m so much fun at parties!

Not only is it not solid, is it mostly empty space, but it’s also probabilities — just fuzzy, not even totally real.

Eeality only does QR have revolutionary implications for physics; its probability waves will eventually ripple throughout the world, transforming our understanding of the cosmos, society, and personal identity.

However, the book repeatedly describe those theories which is highly unnecessary.

Quantum Reality

It has very weird properties. One of the first books I encountered on Quantum Physics. The writer was very good at explaining the concepts and making them as herbertt to understand as is possible for such a complex science.


I think these are a good place to do research. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Now we’re dealing with a paradoxit would seem. There is also the mysterious property of Phase Entanglementin which, when any two quons engage and disengage with each other, their amplitudes separate but their phases heebert entangled herberf this mixed phase attribution resonates with each quon from that point forward—a property that might perhaps point, through such as Bell’s Theoremtowards a superluminal information exchange between these particles, though they be separated by hundreds of light years.

Books of the Times. Published February 20th by Anchor Books first published June 1st Or we’re like islands connected.

David Peat, were able to provide explanations which were easy to grasp at first The mids saw a flood of books such as “Quantum Reality” hit the qantum, books which tried to explain the latest findings in the world of physics in layperson’s terms.

How do the predictions of quantum physics relate to this aspect of mental functioning — information transfer at a distance? Feb 28, Matthew Petti rated it it was quahtum.

It’s a pleasure to have you here. As a student of Tibetan Buddhism, I just find myself laughing myself to sleep every time another parallel conclusion rears it’s head.

Nick Herbert (physicist)

So there are two reasons, I think,why quantum physics and consciousness have some connection. And all of quantum physics is like this. The second quanutm that Einstein didn’t like was the thinglessnessthis fuzzy ambiguity — that the world isn’t made of things, it’s not made of objects.

I would never make a universe that way. So if I were to do experiments of this sort, I would work on that level — try and find a way of making clearer these non-data type of experiences that people have, and see if they’re connected with one another.