RFC 2327 PDF

The Most Common Message Body. ▫ Be session information describing the media to be exchanged between the parties. ▫ SDP, RFC (initial publication). Simply the doesn’t understand this extension. A lot of SIP/WebRTC/ SDP software don’t have support for this. Instead of using the. M. Handley and V. Jacobson, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” RFC , IETF Network Working Group, , April

Author: Jusho Toran
Country: Spain
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 25 January 2004
Pages: 209
PDF File Size: 17.56 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.25 Mb
ISBN: 749-9-74348-147-3
Downloads: 69818
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kashicage

All says about it is: Network News Transfer Protocol.

List of RFCs

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

RFCwhile not perfect, greatly clarifies the text to fix those problems, and to reflect existing practice. On 5 Junat If I try to parse the following sdp with help of Microsoft. Trivial File Transfer Protocol.


Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327

Views Read Edit View history. Adam Wright 4.

Tuesday, June 05, 8: Internet Standards Request for Comments Internet-related lists. Rtc doesn’t understand this extension. Something along the lines of: They don’t expect to support until the end ofif it doesn’t slip The text also says to ignore unknown atributes, but that assumes you’ve been able to parse the attribute name.

List of RFCs – Wikipedia

Site Multihoming by IPv6 Intermediation. It seems like RFC section 10 Summary of changes since RFC should have mentioned this issue, and others where complying with would make you at least in theory not interoperable with RFC At least one of them is.

Reverse Address Resolution Protocol. Dan Wing dwing ; [hidden email] ; [hidden email] ; [hidden email] Subject: For scalable video coding these indications are still under discussion.

Please find the last draft here: And why was a name chosen that might break backwards compatibility? Houston, we have a problem. Problems with RFC vs RFC ,and between and Christian, The rrfc, as with much of the text in this document, gives the impression that there are meaningful “RFC implementations”, and that the compatibility issues are due to RFC changing the specification. Rfx is a partial list of RFCs request for comments memoranda.


RFC – SDP: Session Description Protocol

Hello Dan, Are you referring to additional differences between the grammar of attribute names or differences between the RFC and RFC syntax in general? I can only expect that was the intent, yes. Search everywhere only in this topic. Simple Network Management Protocol. In reply to this post by Christian Groves I’ve also added some additional text to address your proposal. Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Post as a guest Name. I guess those who have implemented the drafts wouldn’t be happy though: