Find the most up-to-date version of SAE J at Engineering The direct final rule will permit seat belts to meet the requirements of the more recent revisions of the SAE J and SAE J standards. DATES: This direct. This SAE Standard establishes the minimum performance requirements for pelvic restraint systems (seat belts, anchorages, and the fastening elements of seat.
|Published (Last):||7 May 2015|
|PDF File Size:||12.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.68 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Australian Standards for Seat Belts
Buckle Hardware Requirements 6. This direct final rule provides at least the same level of m386 for miners at a lower cost for mine sae j Also, allowing the use of seat belts meeting other revisions of the SAE standards, rather sae j only the most sae j, allows mine operators to use the supply of sae j seat belts they already have on hand.
MSHA is not updating Sec.
It shall also be capable of being released with either sqe mittened hand. The incorporation by reference of certain publications in this rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 20, The seat belt shall also be designed to secure the pelvis and remain in the pelvic area under operating, collision, or roll-over conditions. To the contrary, there are cost savings associated with not having to special order discontinued, older seat belts and not having to replace those seat belts already installed.
The final rule also added a provision, Eae.
It must be made of a material having properties equal to or better than that stated in paragraph 5. The authority citation for part 56 continues to read as follows: Sae j had u386 removing the incorporation by reference provisions relating to seat belts and accompanying roll-over protective structures ROPS on equipment and replace them with performance criteria 49 FR and It must be made of sae j material having properties equal to or better than that stated in paragraph 5.
This direct final rule aae at least the same level of protection for miners at a lower cost for mine operators. Standards Subsctiption may be the perfect solution. This direct final rule is effective June 20,without further notice, unless we receive significant adverse comments by J86 21, MSHA enforcement of its j3386 belt standards relies on the labeling of seat belts in accordance with the SAE standards.
These SAE consensus standards are incorporated by reference. Subscribe to E-mail Updates. This stiffness shall be effective for the usable life of the webbing. We also determined, for purposes of Sec. Comments sae j posted for public viewing at http: MSHA has determined that this rulemaking is saw for a direct sae j rule because we do not expect that updating the metal and nonmetal seat belt standards, to include the revised SAE consensus sse, will elicit any significant adverse comments.
Purpose— The purpose of this recommended practice is to estab- lish minimum requirements for a pelvic restraint belt suitable’ for use primarily on track-type tractors, wheel tractor-scrapers, wheel loaders, motor graders, and similar types of construction equipment. Seat belts meeting the specifications of earlier versions of these SAE standards are no longer routinely installed by manufacturers. Since MSHA promulgated these standards, however, the SAE has revised them to reflect technological advances in seat belt design and materials.
We have no amendments or corrections for this standard.
You can download and open this file to your own computer but DRM prevents opening this file on another computer, including a networked server. This standard is not included in any packages. The direct final rule expands compliance alternatives to accommodate advances swe seat belt technology without reducing protection for miners. It does not include the method or direction of attachment to the vehicle or seat assembly. Scope— This recommended practice covers the general require- ments for webbing, buckle hardware, adjustment hardware, and attach- ment hardware of the restraint j3866.
The construction of ROPS is beyond the scope of this rulemaking. The authority citation for part 57 continues to read as follows: The companion proposed rule and this direct final rule are substantively identical.
At that time, however, commenters urged MSHA to retain the se by reference and update it. For example, these revisions address developments, such as tether straps and three and four point systems, which are not included in the or revisions. Engineers and safety professionals agree that SAE J performance and test requirements provide a safe operator restraint system for off-road work machines commonly used in mining.
It includes no additional costs and has no adverse economic impact on the metal and nonmetal mining industry.
SAE J386 PDF
Seat belts and assemblies currently manufactured for off-road work machines and haulage trucks comply with SAE J and those currently manufactured sae j tractors comply with SAE J In determining whether a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, we sae j consider whether sae j warrants a substantive response in a notice and comment process. Criminal penalties may apply for noncompliance. J36 does sae j include the method or direction of attachment to j836 vehicle or seat assembly.
If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal of this direct final rule in the Federal Register. The instructions shall show the proper manner of threading the webbing in the hardware of seat belts in which the webbing is not permanently fastened.
We wrote the direct final rule to provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct and have reviewed it to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguities. Engineers wae safety professionals agree that SAE J performance and test requirements provide a safe operator restraint system for off-road work machines commonly used in mining.
SAE J – – Operator Restraint Systems for Off-Road Work Machines | QuestIn
jj386 Factual basis for certification. Direct final rule; request for comments. In determining whether a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, we will consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and comment process.
Please first log in with a verified email before subscribing to alerts. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, we are publishing a companion proposed rule under Sec.
The direct final rule improves safety by updating MSHA’s standards to allow the use of advances in seat belt technology addressed in the newer industry consensus standards.